tarzan in stainless steel
Aku rasa terpanggil pulak bila baca posting ni, for whatever reasons. Kelakar la perbincangan pasal cawat besi ni. Paling aku kelakar dengan soalan ni: "Dato’ Hassan Din cadangkan orang perempuan saja kena pakai cawat besi supaya tidak kena rogol. Tapi, beliau tidak pula suruh orang lelaki, iaitu siperogol yang gila seks tu yang kena pakai cawat besi supaya dia tidak boleh merogol."
No disrespect to women, in any way. But I just must ask this: if men were to wear cawat besi, gila seks or not, then how are they going to go to the bathroom?* And, well, bearing in mind the particular member that is notorious and needed to be contained here, what happens when the member..um..expands?**
Whether or not women should wear the cawat besi is besides the point (and, well, has been discussed in length elsewhere, I believe). Thing is, the wearing of cawat besi is an option for ladies only. They can choose to wear it. Or they can choose to not wear it. The option is there. Not the best option, people will argue, but an option nevertheless. No one is forced to take this option, so nothing inhuman occurred. It's just and option, that's all. It is when men wear it that something inhuman is in progress. And with all due respect, Dato' Hassan Din gave his opinion based on his experience (of possibly hearing or knowing that there was a time when women do wear cawat besi. Like, for real, man). I think it was an honest opinion which did not border on (gaining) popularity. Alas, what do I know?
* and ** : I raised these questions based on the assumption that if someone gila seks is to wear cawat besi, the device must restrict him in ways that shall not be discussed here, and he must not be allowed the key(s) to it. So how meh?
No disrespect to women, in any way. But I just must ask this: if men were to wear cawat besi, gila seks or not, then how are they going to go to the bathroom?* And, well, bearing in mind the particular member that is notorious and needed to be contained here, what happens when the member..um..expands?**
Whether or not women should wear the cawat besi is besides the point (and, well, has been discussed in length elsewhere, I believe). Thing is, the wearing of cawat besi is an option for ladies only. They can choose to wear it. Or they can choose to not wear it. The option is there. Not the best option, people will argue, but an option nevertheless. No one is forced to take this option, so nothing inhuman occurred. It's just and option, that's all. It is when men wear it that something inhuman is in progress. And with all due respect, Dato' Hassan Din gave his opinion based on his experience (of possibly hearing or knowing that there was a time when women do wear cawat besi. Like, for real, man). I think it was an honest opinion which did not border on (gaining) popularity. Alas, what do I know?
* and ** : I raised these questions based on the assumption that if someone gila seks is to wear cawat besi, the device must restrict him in ways that shall not be discussed here, and he must not be allowed the key(s) to it. So how meh?
posted by Jibam at
4:19 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home